Those readers who don’t reside in the city I live in, those who haven’t visited it and is reading my blog for the last two months…you must be thinking that I live in a scum of a city where strange third-worldish things happen…but I am quite content living here, with certain reservations. I thought that the gains are more than the losses…
Something happened last day in my city. I am not interested why it happened any more. It ceased to be my city for a day as bunches of clueless lumpens had a gala day out of banging whimpers. it had the semblance of a riot, but it was not, therefore it was nothing short of a tasteless gag keeping the city hostage for hours. No one died except an image of the city. No body was burned alive except cars. And those burning cars smelt in a eerie way of possible burning bodies…
Everyone is sure that there is a design behind it. Someone says it is the ruling party to distract people of all those recent discontents, someone said it is either of the two leading oppositional ones to prove the messy government to be messier. It is a foolish guessing game where all reasons seems feasible and ridiculous. Ridiculous is another name of the feasible in realpolitik these days. So speaking politics has been elevated to speaking out intricacies of nothings.
When possibilities of people dying was almost eliminated after Rizwanur and Nandigram, the media got an event to cling on. I saw the military personnel are also sporting digital cameras these days and they are shooting a lot.
I told a blogger-friend last night: “A bizarre and obnoxious thing…I was not even able to write something about it…Will be showcased by the police how they were perfectly behaving beings since they shot and killed no one. Providing a puzzle to the media which they will pursue forever forgetting more real wounds and blood! Would have written something but was incapable of summoning a muse of the comic and the grotesque and the burlesque; it has the element of a bitter farce and right now I am in a stupidly emotional and alarmed state. My language would have been ridiculous…”
I was afraid for hours, and now I am bored. Enough from me! Read better writers whom I quote below:
-
Rioting in an auroral city and the twilight of words » Radical Hypocrite
A city in riot. Perhaps I’m exaggerating.
Rioting protesters, riot-police running with all their gadgetry and flag marches by the army happens in central Kolkata. And twilight descends on the city caught like a frightened hare in the snare.
A city in riot, at least parts of it.
Truths are being recalled, truths turning westward, and by the sight of the sun, slung like a rotund ball of blood on the sky, turning blood-red and sinking rapidly to nowhere.
While we, in this mad city, are still coming to terms with a brilliant amorous auroral ’sunrise’ grown out of bloodshed in Nandigram, what a different surprise falls on us with vehemence. Tomorrow the newspapers will tell us something different, but right now, the TV channels are screaming with flames of an unknown colour.
…
There’s someone in the high glass tower right now, with certain blueness about his lips, staring through the looking glass and starting to be glad that a justification of purpose for all the previous wrongs has been provided. Will there, or can be any justification of what was done in Nandigram? Never.
And is it simply dusk? Is it formless darkness?
Is it confusion that rises out of the bowels of the city, confused of its own madness that chases all the sanity out of minds, freezes returning birds in mid-air with all that terror inspired by the word ‘riot’ and ushers in the familiar dread of communal violence that always creeps in like ghosts from an unburied past?
…
Let’s face it. Right now, right here. We have smoke, sawdusts and cinders before our eyes in Kolkata, and I’m ranting in the dark, gentle reader, for there are incredibly stupid people who prefer religious dogma above everything else, all opting for opium and analgesics against the deadening pain of remembering innocent people being killed.Calcutta is Burning » Living like a Flame
In 2000, when I went to live in Medinipur, I was struck by the difference on a day to day basis of the lives of the people there from what we consider ‘mainstream’ Bengal. This was familiar to me from the days when I used to live in North Bengal. The fact is, there are and always have been two Bengals. One is the aspirationally Hindu, uppercaste, narrow-minded metropolitan sentimental ‘cultured’ Bengal which has today usurped the name of ‘bhadralok’, and the other is the other. Bengal is probably one of the few places where the dominant culture of the metropolis is more narrow-minded than that of the margin. That dominant culture claims to celebrate the underdog, while making sure that the underdog stays firmly under and likes it.
The Medinipuris I met were strongly tribal-influenced, independent-minded, educated after their own fashion and acutely aware of the attitude of patronage and pity with which the bhadraloks saw them. My co-faculty members were mostly highly dismissive of them, though they were careful never to say so expressly because ‘these people are very volatile’. This other Bengal is the old Bengal, a Bengal that occasionally hijacks the youth of bhadralok culture and turns them into revolutionaries, the Bengal that existed before the elite of several different foreign lands came and named the place ‘a hell stuffed with sweets’. Bhadralok culture sentimentalises this other as the realm of the little man, the dispossessed in whose name practically anything can be done and got away with. But perhaps not any more.
…
The army is now out on the streets, flag-marching. Curfew seems imminent. The last time I remember this happening was in December 1992. I was at the epicentre then, in Park Circus, watching friends and neighbours run in fear of their lives. The flames I see now are arriving via satellite on my TV screen. They are no less real. But these flames have been lit from a source much closer than Ayodhya, and I don’t see any prospect of their going out in a hurry.Stop press: Turns out that the prime cause of the disturbance was the All India Minorities Forum demanding that Taslima Nasreen’s visa be revoked. Well, I’ve already had my say on that issue here. All I can add is that the campaign for Rizwanur Rahman taught me that the common people of Calcutta are not, by and large, communal. Make of that what you will.
This is What We Get » Living like a Flame
Today I saw streets I’ve walked for years, deserted and strewn with the corpses of burning cars. I saw half naked men imitating Saurabh Ganguly’s shirt-semaphoring while lobbing teargas back at troopers. I saw RAF jawans beating people with knouts. I saw a child pop out of the shanties next to the Lohapool offramp to be confronted with a policeman holding an upraised rock. The child ducked and ran fearfully into the arms of a cameraman. I saw seven men advancing menacingly along the empty Lohapool while RAF jawans threatened them with automatic weapons. I saw the house where I lived for seven years standing next to a struggling mass of men trying to escape a teargas cloud. I saw Yasinbhai’s pan shop through the haze. I didn’t see Yasinbhai.Someone or something must pay for this.
Idris Ali: ‘Taslima is Not a Good Writer’ » Living like a Flame
Idris Ali, in case you’ve never heard of him, is the head of the All India Minorities Forum, the group that called the initial protest that spiralled out of control this morning. The primary purpose of the protest was to demand the revoking of Taslima Nasreen’s visa, effectively forcing her out of the country.
…
Idris Ali appeared on a several-hour-long panel telecast by Star Ananda. Also present were a number of artists and intellectuals…Idris got the worst of it throughout. No surprises there, but the hidden bonus track of the evening came when he confidently stated that the Siddiqui pirs of Furfura Sharif in Hooghly were solidly supporting his agitation to get rid of Taslima. Some time later, the pirs of Furfura Sharif rang up the Star Ananda studio to say on live television that no, they were not supporting the violence the day had witnessed, they did not endorse Idris Ali’s stand, and they condemned the vandalism and arson carried out by Idris Ali’s followers. Idris Ali’s response? To accuse the pirs of Furfura Sharif of being instruments of the CPIM, of taking money from America, and of having no concern for the sentiments of Muslims. He then named a Siddiqui who he claimed was on his side; the pirs said the man was a junior pir and didn’t represent them all. Idris Ali was saved by a commercial break.
…
Most of the people rioting on the streets today, I am willing to warrant, have never read a full length book, let alone anything by Nasreen. Quite a few of them possibly can’t read. All of them I saw on TV were men: I don’t know if any women took part; probably not. Most were painfully young; young enough to be in school or college. Yet here they were, getting their kit off, dancing like monkeys in the light of burning tires. Clearly they had nothing better to do.
Someone (or something again, though there isn’t really much difference) has betrayed these children. They are instruments of a hate that sent them out to destroy in the name of a literacy to which they can’t aspire. All they probably know about Taslima Nasreen is that she’s a woman of questionable morals who wrote a book that discusses dirty subjects in connection with religion, and that they should do their best to get her kicked out of the country. In the process, they get to traumatise the fat cats who ride around in cars, who are by definition evil because the young boys don’t have cars.
…
It was clear from the way they were behaving that those boys saw themselves as heroes. They were fighting a glorious war to save their religion while looking good to the other guys in the process. Or they were simply fighting a glorious war: there’s no guarantee that all of them were Muslim. For those few hours, they were showing the world, giving back as good as they got, making a difference. No doubt for days afterwards they’ll tell stories about how they lobbed the teargas shell back at the police, or how they overturned that jeep and poured petrol on the wheels. They’ll feel like they made history.
The Sword and the Monk’ s Cowl » Kafila.org
Just as society in Kolkata was conquering a new content for itself in the wake of Nandigram and even the murder of Rizwanur Rahman, the state (and its shadows), to all intents and purposes have returned to its oldest form in West Bengal. Even as I write, the Army is out on the streets of Kolkata, imposing a curfew, and the past few hours have been spent witnessing (on television in my case) the ridiculous and pathetic spectre of what seems even at first glance to be an orchestrated outbreak of rioting on the streets. Clearly, there will be no more rallies against the CPI(M);s actions in Nandigram in the coming days in Kolkata.
…
For weeks, since the mysterious death of Rizwanur Rahman, allegedly at the behest of a powerful trading family, allegedly with the connivance of the senior echelons of the Kolkata police, allegedly acting under the patronage of the ruling party – the CPI(M) and for days, since the ‘retaking’ of Nandigram by a militia of CPI(M) cadres – the streets of Kolkata have witnessed a flowering of fraternization between young people, students, peasants, activists disturbed by the happennings of Nandigram, intellectuals and cultural workers.In both responses, the response to Nandigram, and in the response to Rizwanur Rahman’s death, we have seen a great deal of involvement by people who happen to be Muslims, and this is in part because of the fact that Rizwanur was murdered because he happenned to be not well off, and Muslim, and because incidentally, a large number of people affected in Nandigram also happen to be Muslim.
What this was leading to was a degree of fraternization between Muslims and others, not on grounds of secterian identitiy or communal harmony, but on banal, and utterly secular issues that had to do with the blatant misuse of power and the realities of having to live with capitalism.
…
Muslims in West Bengal have a lot to worry about, terrible social and economic indicators…unemployment, an apathetic government that holds them hostage to the shibboleth of ’secularism’ and the violence that has scarred and displaced so many poor Muslim peasants in Nandigram. Taslima Nasrin neither steals Muslim bread, nor appropriates Muslim peasants land, nor keeps Muslim kids away from school, nor organizes riots against them, nor condemns them to a situation of studied social apathy. She may or may not be a good writer, and is probably not even by her own self description a ‘good Muslim’ but by raising questions that have to do with exegesis and Quranic interpretation, she is only demonstrating the continuity of her project with the long tradition of reasoned and passionate philosophical enquiries about faith that have been part of Islamicate traditions. The partisans of the All India Minorities Forum, like their Hindu fundamentalist peers, may be performatively pious, but they certainly have no handle on the rich intellectual heritage and history of doubt within the cultures they claim as their own…
Kolkata violence: Irresponsible Jamiat playing with fire » An Indian Muslim’s Blog
If it was a protest over just Nandigam, I could understand. But the way Jamiat brought the issue of Taslima Nasrin and also the murder of Rizwanur Rahman, it is a dangerous signal. For Rizwanur Rahman, the entire Bengal has come together. And Muslims surely have other problems to worry about than Taslima.
I don’t know how many protestors have read her works. They are not readable anyhow. And even if she has written something that doesn’t go well with us, we have the option not to read it or ignore it. With every such protest Taslima’s stature as a writer will go up even if she doesn’t deserve that.
Violent street protests don’t serve anybody. But what perturbs me the most is the involvement of Jamiat-e-Ulama and the Muslim Forum. By communalising the issues and raising the same old ‘victim’ complex, it is not going to help Muslims of West Bengal rather anti-Muslim feelings may rise.
As I saw the stone pelting on streets and the iamges of burning car and mob clashing with police, imposition of curfew, I could imagine what must be going through the minds of many non-Muslims, ‘These Muslims, the troublemakers…they are at it again’. I am not sure about the All India Minority Forum whether it has any following amongst Muslims in West Bengal.
But Jamiat’s political ambitions are a cause of worry. Muslims must fight for their rights, but peacefully, as as part of the society by taking along others. Muslims should raise their voice against atrocities on themselves and also other sections of society who are facing injustice. The minority community can’t afford to be an insulated group.





Given how many times you have used the word pseudo-secular, could you enlighten us whats your definition of secular and pseudosecular. Or more specifically what part of a pseudosecular behavior is not secular and vice versa. I keep hearing the term/label thrown about wantonly as a sort of gag order, much like the term anti-semetic is used nowadays, so i would like to understand that. A non ad-hominem and articulate explanation would be highly appreciated.
Take any religion, the history of its politics is messy, no one is holier. Islam is neither the best nor the worst. One should read as many books as possible to get the perspective. I am ignoring your contradictiion were you claim first hinduism does not have a book and then in the next paragraph advise them to read theirs. You should also know not all sects of muslims take hadith at its face value
About hinduism, you can believe in anything or nothing and still be a hindu according to some definition of it. Even your godless commie can be fit into the folds of hinduism. But that does not take away the fact that many ills of the society were encouraged in hindu religion as in many others. Pointing fingers at one religion and in particular citing out of context is actually quite (pun unintended) pointless. Furthermore the flexibility of the definition of hinduism has been and will be abused as an escape from accountibility.
There is nothing right or wrong in talking about fundamentalism, there is no dearth of forums to discuss such matters. This forum is owned by someone who wants to give space for a different point of view that have followers and he has absolute right to do so.
Lastly the matter of Jihad, its more of a recruitment banner, a jersey if you will, not the cause. It is something that is invoked to legitimize a cause not he cause itself.
Though the hadiths talk about jihad as an armed struggle, quran talks about jihad of the self, of the tongue, of the hand and ofcourse the sword. In arabic its a catchall term to mean a struggle to attain oneness with god. Being a mullah you should be aware of these things, sad that i have to educate you about your own religion and i am not even a muslim.
I hope you are aware of these words by Muhammed
“The ink of the scholar is more sacred than the blood of the martyr”
“The most excellent jihad (struggle) is that for the conquest of self”
“He is the most perfect Muslim whose disposition is best; and the best of you are they who behave best to their wives”
Ironically enough, it is your beloved hadith that disparages “jihad of the sword” as a ‘lesser’ jihad and says that the ‘greater’ jihad is one of the mind. That too at a number of places, so much so that the radical religious leaders find the hadith an inconvenience. Depending on how militant they are they claim that the hadith is weak on those aspects or that the hadiths are an outright fabrication and should not be adhered to (thats the view of bin laden’s mentor, i forget his name).
So the last thing that the hooligans are doing is obeying their book.
Besides that, do yourself a favour read your hadith before you start claiming things about it. I guess you apply to yourself your preaching that “Muslims is (sic) to not read their texts…”
Very easy, here is the definition of psedo-secular:
http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Pseudo-secularism
I am not talking about history of politics in Islam, I am saying that Islam is a complete political system with its own laws(sharia). You either follow these laws or you are not a Muslim, end of story.
There is no contradiction in my statement, I said Hinduism does not have ‘a’ book, meaning that there is no single book like the Quran,Bible etc. but does not mean there are no reference books like the Ramayana,Mahabharata,Gita etc.
No way am I claiming Hinduism is perfect, but it has flexibility because its an Umbrella religion, in that recognizes different gods and forms of worship and does not say that you have to kill people who don’t believe in one particular god. BTW, I am not an expert on Hinduism, I only know islam.
All Muslims are supposed to follow Hadiths according to context. Anyone who does not do so is not a Muslim, end of story.
My comments are very much in context of this article, you see this article talks about riots where rioters claimed they are only following their book. So all I am saying is that they are correct!
Finally let me burst the usual pseudo-secular myths you have written:
“The ink of the scholar is more sacred than the blood of the martyr”
The holy prophet (PUBH), never said this in the Quran or Hadiths. If you can point me to valid hadith (bukhari or muslim) or verse of Quran, I will change my name to mullah in training.
“The most excellent jihad (struggle) is that for the conquest of self”
This is not from a reliable source and there are more than 200 references to Jihad in strong hadiths and all of them point to war,(I don’t approve these websites but the hadiths they point to are authentic)
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Articles/Greater-Lesser-Jihad.htm
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Myths-of-Islam.htm#jihad
“He is the most perfect Muslim whose disposition is best; and the best of you are they who behave best to their wives”
A true statement, but you see bad behavior by Husbands is not punishable by anything but no such luck for women.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Quran/003-wife-beating.htm
i) you are changing your story. initially you claimed the vandalism was out of the religious faith in the book, to which i disagreed saying it was political. Now you come around to saying “Islam is a complete political system”. Make up your mind.
ii) look up your own post you have made several mentions of your poor opinion on islamic history, then u say you are not taliking about islamic history.
iii) you seem to indicate that the only muslim is the fundamentalist muslim. Much as you would dislike to know, that is not the end of story, just because you say so. Hadiths have been challenged on several occaisons. Mainly because hadiths were compiled by different scholars and not Mohammeds written work per se, there is a lot of disagreement among islamic clerics about their complete authenticity.
What is hillarious is that the religionofpeace site that you think is THE authoritative exposition of islamic teaching, that itself questions the authority of hadiths. Follow your ownlink on greater jihad.
iv) Yes the troublemakers did claim they were only following the book, if that is your interpretation of the book then have to say you are as much of a fundamentalist as them. they CHERRY-PICK verses to suit their pollitical agenda and challenging quranic verses or hadiths as inauthentic that contradicts their purpose.
v) Dont live under the false delusion about the politics of hinduism. It has its own share of fundamentalist ideas, which have always enforced when it can what it considers the authoritative books. Similarly it has its nonfundamentalist aspects but so does islam. The sad part is that there has been a huge concerted effort to sell the idea that only islam is a fundamentalist islam, a view that you hold but is not true. Even if i dont talk about the obvious contender sufi, there are several schools of thought among islam that are not fundamentalist. Infact one of the sources of hindu reform was the literature of the mutazili tradition of islam.
Since you bring up the fact that islam specifies a law, so does hinduism and that is what manusmrit: the laws of manu is and i have given examples from there which showed on some issues it is less progressive than islam, such as wife’s right to property. Fundamentalist hindus believe that whats there should be followed to the hilt. There also prescriptions in other texts about widow burning, even mock-bestiality.
If its you who chose to believe in the most radically fundamentalist aspects of a religion the problem lies in you, and whoever else believes so, not in the religion.
iv) i dont disagree that hadiths talk about an armed jihad and have indicated so in as many words. But both in quran and in hadith it has been claimed at several places that is only a lesser jihad.
v) sorry i am not buying religionofpeace.com drivel. Its a dedicated islam hate site, if thats the source of your islamic teachings then i can only feel sorry for you. Quote independent sources or works of scholarship or credibility, there is no dearth of credible sites with the hadiths and quran translated into english. But you still chose that one didnt you.
vi) i dont know arabic so the mohammed that i have read is in english. if i remember correctly the scholar/martyr saying is not from the quran but from ahadith dont remember if its in bukhari’s or muslim’s or qudsi. That particular englis translation is not hard to find, google will happily do the honours.
Vii) you did quote from a neutral source ala reference.com i am sure you will find the translations of mohammed quotes there. Or refer to the english translation of the entire quran and hadith(bukhari) that are available at university or library sites and such credible sites.
Hello Srean! Just to inform that since my net connection is temporarily suspended in my home, it will take time to approve your and others’ comments for a week or so. Sorry for the resulting delay!
no problemo, i think i have spoken more than i would have intended too. After a while it becomes a waste of time in engaging in such conversations when no one is going to give up any intellectual territory
. But hopefully i added something, good or bad for some readers to ponder over.